[Bug c++/41503] function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p segfaults when passed a PARM_DECL created by IPA-SRA

2009-10-02 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-02 11:39 --- Fixed -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/41503] function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p segfaults when passed a PARM_DECL created by IPA-SRA

2009-10-01 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-01 09:31 --- Subject: Bug 41503 Author: jamborm Date: Thu Oct 1 09:31:08 2009 New Revision: 152365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152365 Log: 2009-10-01 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR

[Bug c++/41503] function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p segfaults when passed a PARM_DECL created by IPA-SRA

2009-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:16 --- *** Bug 41527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/41503] function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p segfaults when passed a PARM_DECL created by IPA-SRA

2009-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:17 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/41503] function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p segfaults when passed a PARM_DECL created by IPA-SRA

2009-09-29 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 16:42 --- The following patch fixes the problem, I will send it to the mailing list soon: 2009-09-29 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR c++/41503 * cp/pt.c (function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p): Return

[Bug c++/41503] function_parameter_expanded_from_pack_p segfaults when passed a PARM_DECL created by IPA-SRA

2009-09-29 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 16:52 --- (In reply to comment #1) The following patch fixes the problem, I will send it to the mailing list soon: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02105.html --