[Bug c++/41786] misparsing an object declaration - parameter may not have variably modified type

2009-10-22 Thread jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
--- Comment #2 from jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2009-10-22 10:35 --- (In reply to comment #1) I don't think this is misparsing this at all. This is one place in the C++ standard that says it should be parsed as a function declaration rather than a variable declaration

[Bug c++/41786] misparsing an object declaration - parameter may not have variably modified type

2009-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-21 19:49 --- I don't think this is misparsing this at all. This is one place in the C++ standard that says it should be parsed as a function declaration rather than a variable declaration to resolve an ambiguous between those