--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-04 04:56 ---
Fixed for 4.6.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 15:54 ---
Subject: Bug 41970
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 7 15:54:17 2010
New Revision: 158071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158071
Log:
PR c++/41970
* decl.c (grokvardecl): Tweak
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 21:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=19925)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19925action=view)
patch for 4.6
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41970
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:32 ---
We accept this testcase with a warning because it is both common and harmless.
In 4.5, this testcase will be accepted with no warning in -std=c++0x mode, as
we now implement DR 757.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:36 ---
So, removing the accepts-invalid keyword. I'll fix the diagnostic in 4.6.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 10:16 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Should I submit a second report so there is one for accepts invalid and a
different one for diagnostic quality?
No need, thanks. Both can be solved at the same time.
--
manu at gcc
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-11 18:54 ---
Comeau rejects it. Is this accepts-invalid, then?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 01:00 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Comeau rejects it. Is this accepts-invalid, then?
I think so, as I suggested in comment 3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41970
--- Comment #14 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 01:08 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
requires six posts from experts to explain.
I'm not sure where you got that number, after my second comment I was
correcting my own typos or your misunderstanding of unnamed namespaces :)
--- Comment #15 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2010-01-12 01:12 ---
Should I submit a second report so there is one for accepts invalid and a
different one for diagnostic quality?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41970
10 matches
Mail list logo