--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 18:26 ---
Subject: Bug 42013
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 12 18:25:42 2009
New Revision: 154124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154124
Log:
PR c++/42013
* call.c (build_conditional_expr):
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-12 18:47
---
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42013
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 20:26 ---
Subject: Bug 42013
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 12 20:26:36 2009
New Revision: 154129
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154129
Log:
PR c++/42013
* call.c (build_conditional_expr):
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 20:27 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-12 04:09
---
Actually, the observation about C++0x is largely incorrect, because the actual
specifications in DR 1255 are different, use std::add_rvalue_reference.
However, my main puzzlement stands.
Also, as regards the
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 04:16 ---
Might be related to the old fixed bug 36628.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42013
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 05:47 ---
More hoops to jump through to prevent the magic decltype handling of calls
exposed by constant folding...
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
