http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122
SergeyN nenakhov.sergey at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nenakhov.sergey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 09:32:11
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02098.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122
--- Comment #8 from SergeyN nenakhov.sergey at gmail dot com 2012-09-05
09:42:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02098.html
That's nice, but I would really prefer to define my own comparison
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122
--- Comment #10 from SergeyN nenakhov.sergey at gmail dot com 2012-09-05
12:24:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Then put it into a class and add overloaded comparison operators for the
wrapper class. That is the same thing as with
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-19 16:05 ---
Subject: Re: New: g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types
(__m128, __m128d)
Well there is already a builtin operator+ for vector types with the
generic vector support.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 19,
--- Comment #2 from mr dot nuke dot me at gmail dot com 2010-02-19 18:34
---
I'm assuming you are referring to fvec.h and F32vec4. While I will apply this
workaround (one of many many workarounds to get fancy C++ code to work with
g++) it still doesn't solve the underlying problem, and
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 18:51 ---
FYI, this is 15.3/6. __m128 isn't a class nor an enumeration. Maybe it is
for the other compilers as implementation detail.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from mr dot nuke dot me at gmail dot com 2010-02-19 19:15
---
Which means there is already an operator+ defined which is done using the
generic GNU vector support. If you remove your definition of operator+, it
works without it.
I could have sworn I saw
error:
10 matches
Mail list logo