http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-02-20
18:08:14 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk (4.6).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-02-20
17:37:06 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:37:03 2011
New Revision: 170341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170341
Log:
PR c++/46394
gcc/cp/
PR c++/46394
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35722 |
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-04
15:32:53 UTC ---
I think what's happening is, at some point during template parameters
fixup (to build proper canonical types for dependent parms) we try to
substitute the U template parameter pack [a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dseketel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dseketel at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2010-12-17
20:04:18 UTC ---
Note that if I change the function to:
template,
void
>::value
>::type
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
11 matches
Mail list logo
