http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
20:47:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 13 20:46:58 2010
New Revision: 167770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167770
Log:
PR c++/46873
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-12-09 17:44:39
UTC ---
- original.C -
#include map
#include string
void foo()
{
const std::string s;
std::mapstd::string, std::string::value_type(s, s);
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-12-09 17:47:50
UTC ---
Now I noticed the line numbers of ICE differ, so it might be different problem.
Let me know if you need to reduce original.C.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-12-09
18:04:26 UTC ---
Yes, reducing it and filing a separate PR seems a good idea: for sure in map
and string there are no bitfields.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46873
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
--- Comment #4
