http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09
10:58:01 UTC ---
It works for me, the abstraction is completely eliminated by early inlining.
At -Os we do not inline E::foo2 into E::foo1 but that isn't abstraction and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658
--- Comment #2 from Michał Walenciak Kicer86 at gmail dot com 2011-02-09
19:34:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It works for me,
what do you mean by works ?:)
the abstraction is completely eliminated by early inlining.
At -Os we do not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09
20:12:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
It works for me,
what do you mean by works ?:)
works as expected ;) At -Os we inline to remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658
--- Comment #4 from Michał Walenciak Kicer86 at gmail dot com 2011-02-09
21:00:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
It works for me,
what do you mean by works ?:)
works as expected
