http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-01
08:47:11 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 1 08:47:06 2012
New Revision: 188103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188103
Log:
2012-06-01 Manuel López-Ibáñez
Jon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-01
00:38:41 UTC ---
Updated patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg1.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-30
18:58:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> This bug results in real warnings being introduced unnoticed, see:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg02005.html
I think somebody tried
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #15 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-30
18:52:18 UTC ---
This bug results in real warnings being introduced unnoticed, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg02005.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-24
15:29:42 UTC ---
Manuel, what happened to this, out of curiosity? I see an Assigned status (but
the Assigned To field still blank) and a documentation patchlet of yours in the
audit trail?!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-15
12:23:50 UTC ---
Nonetheless, this is a patch that explains the current situation:
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 187462)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -4413,21 +4413,26 @@ This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-15
12:21:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> int f();
> int f(void) { return 0; }
>
> gets a warning with -Wmissing-prototypes but not -Wmissing-declarations,
> because "int f();" is a non-pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-30
14:29:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what "Do so even if the definition itself provides a
> > prototype."
> > means in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-30 14:16:40 UTC ---
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I'm not sure what "Do so even if the definition itself provides a prototype."
> means in the context of C++.
Tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-30
08:04:38 UTC ---
C++ doesn't have prototypes, it has declarations and definitions, so the
different names makes sense.
I'm not sure what "Do so even if the definition itself provides a prototype."
m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-09-30
07:00:40 UTC ---
So Joseph, Jason, what is the difference between Wmissing-prototypes and
Wmissing-declarations?
Can't you just make one a synonym for the other and make one of them the
canonica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-08-20 08:37:21
UTC ---
-Wmissing-declaration should do what you want.
20 matches
Mail list logo
