[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 06:03:11 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 8 06:03:01 2011 New Revision: 178675 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178675 Log: PR c++/50255 *

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-07 Thread stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #7 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com 2011-09-07 12:12:04 UTC --- Created attachment 25220 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25220 reduced test case

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-07 Thread stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #8 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com 2011-09-07 12:14:56 UTC --- Created attachment 25221 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25221 script compiling test case and showing broken

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-02 Thread stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #6 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com 2011-09-02 13:15:42 UTC --- While I still don't have a stripped down test case, I at least know now what is going wrong (on recent gcc-4_6-branch rev 178396, at

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-01 Thread caolanm at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 Caolan McNamara caolanm at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caolanm at

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-01 Thread stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #4 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com 2011-09-01 08:39:59 UTC --- caolanm: will work on it, yes (wanted to clarify first whether looking at those group name mismatches is actually looking in the

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-09-01 Thread stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #5 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail dot com 2011-09-01 12:10:54 UTC --- By the way, the problem of the rodata section having a different GroupName than the text section is also present when you compile

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-08-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 21:03:36 UTC --- GCC 4.6.0 20110603 (Red Hat 4.6.0-10)). Does it happen with non RedHat version of the compiler meaning non modified version of GCC? Really you should have

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

2011-08-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 21:06:43 UTC --- This sounds like http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 but without a testcase it is hard to say if it was really on the 4.6 branch or only with