http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #31 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-17
15:04:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
Another example is binary operators between scalar and vectors. In C the
scalar
is automatically treated as a vector, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #32 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com 2013-02-17
15:23:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
Another example is binary operators between scalar and vectors. In C the
scalar
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #28 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-27 14:19:25 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 27 14:19:17 2012
New Revision: 189017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189017
Log:
2012-06-27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-15 16:43:44 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 15 16:43:36 2012
New Revision: 188671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188671
Log:
2012-06-15 Marc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #26 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14 11:22:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
(In reply to comment #21)
What does it mean exercise the backend a lot? Do you mean it takes a lot
of
time?
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-30
17:23:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 30 17:23:28 2012
New Revision: 186994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186994
Log:
PR c++/51033
gcc/
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #23 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-24
11:57:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
What does it mean exercise the backend a lot? Do you mean it takes a lot of
time?
I think so.
I haven't looked at the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-22
10:31:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 27217
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27217
shuffle
With this patch, g++ passes the few __builtin_shuffle tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #20 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-22
13:21:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Created attachment 27217 [details]
shuffle
Doesn't work with -std=c++11, which requires:
--- semantics.c(revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-22
14:56:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
With this patch, g++ passes the few __builtin_shuffle tests I tried, and
generates generic code for non-constant indexes and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #22 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-22
15:09:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
And then I still need to write a cxx_eval_vec_perm function so the result of
__builtin_shuffle can be constexpr. I haven't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-17
10:22:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 27176
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27176
subscript
This patch (a simple copy of a paragraph from the C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-17
11:59:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
If it is indeed a copy, you should move the code c-common.c and share it. The
C-family FEs should share as much code as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17
12:13:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
On the other hand, here I am copying a small block of code in the middle of a
function. Making just that paragraph common
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-17
13:06:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 27178
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27178
subscript 2 (Manuel-compliant)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17
13:23:11 UTC ---
:) Thanks for making me happy and sorry for being a PITA.
Are you planning to send it to gcc-patches for approval or are you not happy
with it yet?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-17
13:57:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Are you planning to send it to gcc-patches for approval or are you not happy
with it yet?
There is the problem of moving
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17
14:11:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Are you planning to send it to gcc-patches for approval or are you not happy
with it yet?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-17
16:41:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
And now I should actually bootstrap and run the testsuite ;-)
Good luck!
It worked fine, same failures as I got the other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
26 matches
Mail list logo
