https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is already fixed in mainline, though. I'm adding the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
As a matter of fact, I can't reproduce the issue with 4.9.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #22 from Matheus Izvekov mizvekov at gmail dot com ---
Apologies, it was a problem on my end!
The fault was just clang and gcc having different default binary names on msys,
'a.out' vs 'a.exe', and me using a stale exe when testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Matheus Izvekov mizvekov at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizvekov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #19 from Matheus Izvekov mizvekov at gmail dot com ---
CWG 1170 is still not correctly implemented as of gcc 4.9.1
The attached test shows just this.
Compile it with
g++ -std=c++11 -DPUB=0 test.cc and
g++ -std=c++11 -DPUB=1 test.cc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Shane w.shane.grant at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w.shane.grant at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
But this example works in mainline (would be 4.9.0) and I don't think it's a
regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:50:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:49:51 2012
New Revision: 190946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190946
Log:
PR c++/54437
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-25
03:30:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 25 03:30:11 2012
New Revision: 190664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190664
Log:
PR c++/51213 (again)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-02 18:45:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Aug 2 18:44:58 2012
New Revision: 190093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190093
Log:
/cp
2012-08-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-07-24
10:34:56 UTC ---
So, first we have a typo at pt.c:6142:
orig_arg = make_typename_type (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0),
TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-07-23
23:35:42 UTC ---
Weird indeed, thanks Daniel. Tomorrow I will have a look and either will send a
patch or will post an analysis (if I will get stuck).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-19
01:36:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 19 01:36:50 2012
New Revision: 189639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189639
Log:
DR 1170
PR c++/51213
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxdebayser at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-04-27
09:26:39 UTC ---
Yes, in a few areas the 4.7.x library is much closer to the letter of C++11 in
terms of constraining, and of course we never did access control under
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27
01:31:49 UTC ---
This looks like the root cause. along with r174464, of a regression in C++11
mode from 4.6-4.7 on the following program:
$ cat test.cc
#include utility
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
22 matches
Mail list logo
