[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2022-02-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2022-02-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2021-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Known to fail|

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2014-10-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) Reduced: template class T T list(T x); template class H, class ...T auto list(H h, T ...args) - decltype(list(args...)); auto

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2014-10-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also I guess we can unsuspend this and close as INVALID now that EWG rejected it. And maybe issue a diagnostic for comment 12, as EDG and clang do?

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2014-05-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tower120 at

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2014-05-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ville, has EWG taken a look at this issue? I'm sorry this didn't come up in the C++14 context, as it would have made sense to fix this when we were adding deduced return types.

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2014-05-08 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 --- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9) Ville, has EWG taken a look at this issue? I'm sorry this didn't come up in Not yet. The handling of Extension-status Core

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

2014-05-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|