http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27
08:52:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 26476
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26476
pointer_map patch
local_specializations isn't GTY(()) marked at all and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27
17:56:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 27 17:55:55 2012
New Revision: 183637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183637
Log:
PR c++/51852
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-27
19:44:54 UTC ---
The testcase and my original program now compile successfully. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-26
21:48:09 UTC ---
I bisected the SVN history between the snapshot that worked and the snapshot
that gave the error - it appears at r182668.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-27
05:37:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
One thing to do is to use --param ggc-min-expand=1 --param ggc-min-heapsize=1
and try to reduce it from there. And then when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #15 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-27
06:29:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
One thing to do is to use --param ggc-min-expand=1 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=1
and try to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #17 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-27
07:30:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
make check-g++-strict-gc finds failures on several variadic template tests,
including variadic99.C, so I don't think reducing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16
10:15:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
The message Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3 stands out
That just means the version of gdb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-16
16:12:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
The message Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3 stands out
That
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-14
08:06:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
you could also try building with --enable-checking=valgrind
When I try to build gcc with --enable-checking=valgrind, I get the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-14
08:39:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26322
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26322
valgrind output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-14
08:40:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #2)
you could also try building with --enable-checking=valgrind
When I try to build gcc with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14
00:36:19 UTC ---
surely this is obvious, don't HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø before you txøtsø ;)
you could also try building with --enable-checking=valgrind or run cc1plus
under gdb and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-14
07:11:43 UTC ---
Here is stack trace of cc1plus at the point where it prints garbage:
#0 tree_check_failed (node=0x7fffdc568b40, file=0xf8f214
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14
07:20:06 UTC ---
The message Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3 stands out
That just means the version of gdb you are using does not understand the dwarf2
extensions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-01-14
07:55:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The message Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3 stands out
That just means the version of gdb you are using does not
23 matches
Mail list logo
