[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 16:18:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Mar 2 16:18:25 2012 New Revision: 184796 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184796 Log: /cp 2012-03-02

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 09:48:32 UTC --- not a gcc bug, you're code is invalid - values of default arguments are not part of the function type and do not take part in deduction you can do it in

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #6 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-01-25 10:29:29 UTC --- Also, new is_containerT with decltype, have value == 0 for any, non-void type.

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 11:56:50 UTC --- My code was only meant to show a possible problem with invalid expressions using void* not to solve your issue. GCC's bugzilla isn't a tutorial site and my

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #8 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-01-25 12:29:22 UTC --- I understand that. And thank you for giving me a hint and code for is_container, it was more than I expected if it was non-bug. I've made the comment

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 17:32:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Jason, shouldn't deduction fail for ((U*)0)-foo() with U=void instead of giving an error? Yep. Need to pass complain into

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #1 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-01-25 05:03:14 UTC --- Created attachment 26451 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26451 deque-bug.ii

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #2 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-01-25 05:04:00 UTC --- Created attachment 26452 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26452 deque-bug.s

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #3 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-01-25 05:04:56 UTC --- Created attachment 26453 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26453 gcc error