https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xmh970252187 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||darktemplar at basealt dot ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|88655 |94404
Alias|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominique.pelle at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-26
23:06:05 UTC ---
17 was the rough consensus at Kona for the target for the next standard. You
could use -std=c++1y or c++1x or whatever instead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-04-26
23:14:18 UTC ---
Oh, Ok, I wasn't there. In GCC we currently use -std=c++1y, but you know that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-26
23:56:22 UTC ---
Oops, I didn't actually realize you'd allocated an option for that in 4.8, and
was just making one up. Sorry for the distraction.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
12 matches
Mail list logo