http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-31
12:02:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Where should I specify that flag? _GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP is still undefined
when I build gcc with
configure CFLAGS='-O3'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #6 from Matt Kline mkline at cs dot wisc.edu 2012-03-31 14:52:40
UTC ---
Well this certainly isn't my brightest moment. That seems to be the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #4 from Matt Kline mkline at cs dot wisc.edu 2012-03-30 19:19:03
UTC ---
Where should I specify that flag? _GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP is still undefined
when I build gcc with
configure CFLAGS='-O3' --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23
12:45:48 UTC ---
Don't define that manually, you should configure gcc with
--enable-libstdccxx-time instead.
We need to revisit the configure tests for nanosleep and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #2 from Matt Kline mkline at cs dot wisc.edu 2012-03-23 13:19:44
UTC ---
Thanks for shedding some light on this. Is there a reason that
--enable-libstdccxx-time isn't shown on
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-23
13:34:31 UTC ---
Should be in the *library* configure docs, no? Anyway, looking forward, now
that glibc is maintained in a slightly different way we should probably
