http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #23 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-27 06:48:28 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #21)
Is there any chance this 'feature' of GCC could be kept as a g++ specific
extension in 'gnu++11' mode, as I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #6 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 09:06:01 UTC ---
The suggested work around in the error message 'adding -fpermissive' to
gcc-4.7.0 does not fix the problem as suggested by the error message. This
would suggest the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #8 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 10:15:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Have a read of the C++ standard, the example given in:
N3242=11-0012 14.6 Name Resolution: paragraph 10
Which I have pasted above into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #11 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 11:07:14 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Can you point me at where in the specification this is defined?
(In reply to comment #2)
The function called in the template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #12 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 11:14:00 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #10)
although -fpermissive allows the code to compile (in some circumstances) it
does not in all, and it also produces incorrect output, for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #13 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 11:25:40 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #9)
From ISO14882 14.6 - Name resolution [temp.res]
-8- When looking for the declaration of a name used in a template definition,
the usual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-05
11:31:07 UTC ---
[temp.dep.res] says dependent name resolution considers declarations visible at
the point of definition, and declarations from associated namespaces from the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-05
11:33:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
although -fpermissive allows the code to compile (in some circumstances) it
does not in all, and it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #16 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 11:53:32 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Basic.lookup.argdep is not specific to templates, so why does the dependent
lookup work outside of templates?
int g(int x) {
return x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #16 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 11:53:32 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Basic.lookup.argdep is not specific to templates, so why does the dependent
lookup work outside of templates?
int g(int x) {
return x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-05
11:57:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
why does ADL work here if [basic.lookup.argdep] means what you imply?
That's not ADL, so I don't know what you're asking.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #19 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 12:55:06 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #18)
Sorry about that. It does indeed seem that the combination of [temp.dep.res]
and [basic.lookup.argdep] imply this behaviour. I think my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-06-05
16:31:21 UTC ---
I'm under the impression that the bug reports using the word 'broken' are the
ones most likely broken, err invalid. Maybe just another manifestation of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #21 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-05 17:01:01 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #20)
Yes, once again sorry. Obviously not GCC's problem for implementing the
standard correctly, but this causes problems producing elegant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-05
17:30:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Is there any chance this 'feature' of GCC could be kept as a g++ specific
extension in 'gnu++11' mode, as I think the old
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #3 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-04 13:44:14 UTC ---
From: Technicalities C.13.8.3:
struct X { X(int); /* ... */ };
void g(X);
templateclass T void f(T a) { g(a); }
void h()
{
extern void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #4 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-04 16:38:21 UTC ---
From C++ Standard N3242=11-0012 14.6 Name Resolution
10. If a name does not depend on a template-parameter (as defined in 14.6.2), a
declaration (or set of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #5 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-04 17:13:18 UTC ---
The following program will apparently compile correctly, but will silently
produce incorrect results at runtime:
#include iostream
char g(char x) {
return x -
21 matches
Mail list logo
