http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 9 18:15:57 2014
New Revision: 210282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210282root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/32019
* call.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-22
07:37:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
strct s struct_strct( items, myItems, name, myName ) ;
}
/code
This works!
Only because NULL can be converted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-21
19:51:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Shouldn't g++ be complaining about initializing a string with a liststring
rather than this cryptic no match for ternary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-08-21
20:08:02 UTC ---
Indeed.
About my own reply, I'm not sure, the wording here is pretty subtle, we already
handle separately the ambiguous overloading case. ICC refers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-21
20:24:15 UTC ---
I think clang's incompatible operand types is simple and fairly clear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #5 from Jason Vas Dias jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com 2012-08-21
20:27:36 UTC ---
Oops, I was interrupted adding this comment to my initial comment - will
respond
to subsequent commment next :
Incidentally, I found this issue while
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #6 from Jason Vas Dias jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com 2012-08-21
20:29:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
In mainline the diagnostics is better because we output the types. But I agree
that given that the conditional operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #7 from Jason Vas Dias jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com 2012-08-21
20:34:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
Shouldn't g++ be complaining about initializing a string with a liststring
rather than this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54348
--- Comment #8 from Jason Vas Dias jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com 2012-08-21
20:52:12 UTC ---
All I'm suggesting is that g++ should try to find the most basic error,
which is that different type objects are returned as the result of a
11 matches
Mail list logo
