[Bug c++/54835] [C++11] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

2013-02-16 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-02-16 11:57:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm not opposed to this behavior, but I think it would be a language change. Thanks Jason. I just see now

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

2013-02-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

2013-01-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW