[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-15 01:27:52 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 01:27:47 2013 New Revision: 196070 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196070 Log: PR c++/54922

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 11:15:50 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 7 11:15:40 2012 New Revision: 193292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193292 Log: /cp

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Bug 54922 depends on bug 55226, which changed state. Bug 55226 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE regression in regard to anonymous unions and constexpr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55226 What|Old Value

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23 23:43:25 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 23 23:43:21 2012 New Revision: 192749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192749 Log: /cp

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-20 23:21:42 UTC --- Related to PR54768.

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-20 23:31:41 UTC --- Related to PR51675.

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-10-13 20:54:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Some copy'n-paste error occurred while attempting to format the code example. The correct code under investigation was: