subject:"\[Bug c\+\+\/56084\] poor error recovery for missing ;"

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2021-06-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |---

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2021-06-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2020-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2019-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2019-05-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2018-06-16 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallag

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2018-03-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2013-01-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-23 17:44:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > BTW, what is the difference between deduction and substitution? Some template arguments are deduced from the function arguments, and those argume

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2013-01-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-23 17:31:21 UTC --- Strange. In the GCC farm and without any customization, clang uses gray for the note. I have seen presentations where it also uses this color scheme. I don't know if they have s

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2013-01-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-23 17:17:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Of course, the color output makes much easier to spot the "note:". Er, not here, bold black (the color they chose for "note:") on a black background

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2013-01-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-23 17:10:58 UTC --- Of course, the color output makes much easier to spot the "note:". And the use of a common prefix "note: candidate function..." or "note: candidate template..." also makes easie

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2013-01-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-23 17:05:14 UTC --- BTW, what is the difference between deduction and substitution?

[Bug c++/56084] poor error recovery for missing ";"

2013-01-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-23 17:02:02 UTC --- > (Separately, I'm investigating whether there's some way to reduce the output > when an invalid ostream operation is done, because the sheer number of > overloads of operator<<