[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-03-17 Thread bruck.michael at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Michael Bruck bruck.michael at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-03-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 03:51:11 UTC --- Now that 4.8.0 is about to be released, I'm reluctant to backport non-regression C++11 fixes to 4.7.

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-03-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-08 16:03:57 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 8 16:03:48 2013 New Revision: 196549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196549 Log: PR c++/51494

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-03-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-03-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-02-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-02-06 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-02-06 11:42:21 UTC --- The code looks valid to me, I don't see any reason for capturing something here. The expression Test::y should be valid in that scope and

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

2013-02-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED