https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
--- Comment #3 from tower120 ---
But wait, we talk about move constructor. But this is a template class.
Template class can not have move constructor at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
--- Comment #2 from tower120 ---
Well ok, but what about this?
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/e3ce8882c68dbef2
Why it copy with wrong number of argument?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to tower120 from comment #0)
> I'm not sure that this is bug. But this is strange behavior, if you ask me.
GCC's behaviour looks correct to me. If it looks strange to you it's because
you have an
