https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Aug 19 18:50:00 2014
New Revision: 214183
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214183root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/62153
* doc/invoke.texi:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
--- Comment #8 from Franz Sirl sirl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, what about the assignment part of the merged bug 44077:
_Bool var = 3;
Does the fix warn about this? Should I create a new bug report for this part?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This should be enabled in GCC bootstrap:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01555.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
Sounds good. I'll look at it, so mine for now. But the
-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare name is too long - can't we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sure, both FEs should have it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sirl at gcc
