https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Oct 10 20:35:18 2014
New Revision: 216106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63437
* cp-tree.h (REF_PARENTHESIZED_P): Also allow INDIREC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 9 18:05:17 2014
New Revision: 216042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63437
* cp-tree.h (REF_PARENTHESIZED_P): Also allow INDIREC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
--- Comment #2 from Kohei Takahashi ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> in C++14 (a) means the same as static_cast(a).
>
> So it is a reference at this point which means const & is better than &&.
>
> Or at least that is how I und
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
in C++14 (a) means the same as static_cast(a).
So it is a reference at this point which means const & is better than &&.
Or at least that is how I understand this. Does clang implement the C++11 ()
rule co
