https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
--- Comment #6 from Ralf allizgubccg at reallysoft dot de ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
I meant a GCC build, that contains r215459 fix (for that you'd have to build
gcc, 5 nor 4.9.2 haven't been released yet).
But I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
--- Comment #4 from Ralf allizgubccg at reallysoft dot de ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
Actually, I can't reproduce it with 4.9 nor with 5. I'd say your version
doesn't have r215459 yet, which I believe is the fix. Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ralf from comment #4)
I've tried it with 4.9.1 release version.. i don't see any newer release.
Which version should i test?
I meant a GCC build, that contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
--- Comment #1 from Ralf allizgubccg at reallysoft dot de ---
Created attachment 33711
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33711action=edit
preprocessed file generated by segfaulting call
Sorry. needed to zip the file, because it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
