[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2018-03-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2018-03-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2017-11-21 Thread richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 Richard Smith changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2015-08-21 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 --- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen --- Sorry for the noise, I managed to drop out that last line, bummer. So no, this hasn't been fixed yet.

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2015-08-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Hi Ville. Unfortunately it still fails for me, in the same way. Are you using the complete testcase, including the line outside namespace std?

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2015-08-21 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2015-01-27 Thread thakis at chromium dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 --- Comment #1 from thakis at chromium dot org --- (Here's a patch with a libc++-side workaround: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7201 But it'd be good to fix this in the compiler too, of course.)

[Bug c++/64816] gcc claims that constructor is private when it should be accessible

2015-01-27 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNC