https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 29 14:49:12 2016
New Revision: 233812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233812=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/65985
* constexpr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 18 05:08:09 2016
New Revision: 233514
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233514=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/65985
* constexpr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
rhalbersma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
Actually I think it's a dup.
Can we nonetheless ensure that the assert example would become a test case?
