https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
Jason McG jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
--- Comment #4 from Jason McG jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2)
What would you like us to document exactly? How are we supposed to track
...
Perhaps I was unclear. I am asking that you point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If someone cares so much about the static branch predictor, they would be a
compiler developer. This is the first time I have seen a non-compiler developer
care about documenting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
--- Comment #8 from Jason McG jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
...
compiler developer. This is the first time I have seen a non-compiler
developer care about documenting gcc heuristics. Note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
--- Comment #7 from Jason McG jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
If someone cares so much about the static branch predictor, they would be a
...
I am not a compiler developer and I do care about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
--- Comment #1 from Jason McG jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com ---
(In reply to Jason McG from comment #0)
I got my static bp summaries wrong, corrected:
void foo(int i) {
switch(i) {
case 1:
bar1(); // gcc: less likely (same as
