[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.5 |6.0

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5 --- Comment #12 from Richard

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6) > > Perhaps you need to try with -Wunused-const-variable ? There may be some > > problem with

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Well, why don't you answer these questions yourself?

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #10 from

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6) > Perhaps you need to try with -Wunused-const-variable ? There may be some > problem with TREE_READONLY (decl). There is no -Wunused-const-variable in

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- The commit implements removal of stores to write only variables. I suppose that makes them unused. This could trigger more warnings though of course they should honnor -Wno-unused Honza