https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 31 21:36:34 2016
New Revision: 236953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236953=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #6 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
> PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
I believe this was intended to refer to PR c++/70095.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016
New Revision: 236946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #4 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Tom Honermann from comment #3)
> The error in comment 2 was also reported in bug 69364.
I don't know where I got that bug number from. That should have been:
The error in comment 2 was also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #3 from Tom Honermann ---
The error in comment 2 was also reported in bug 69364.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #2 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Tom Honermann from comment #1)
Actually, the test case in comment 1 seems to be a different issue; its failure
is a regression introduced in r234231 via bug 70095.
As of r234231 (and up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #1
