https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Apr 8 20:17:10 2016
New Revision: 234837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/70590 (error: location references block not in block tree)
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8)
> --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> @@ -4143,6 +4143,12 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool
> allow_non_constant,
>
>verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> > Which hunk do you want me to test?
>
> The last one, sorry about the garbled message.
Firefox comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> Which hunk do you want me to test?
The last one, sorry about the garbled message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Which hunk do you want me to test?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Reduced :
// PR c++/70590
// { dg-options "-O2" }
int a;
constexpr int *
foo ()
{
return &a;
}
void blah (int *);
int
bar ()
{
blah (foo ());
}
int
baz ()
{
blah (foo ());
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > > location references block not in block tree generally mean
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > location references block not in block tree generally means insufficient
> > unsharing, where some function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> location references block not in block tree generally means insufficient
> unsharing, where some function that got through gimple-low.c where
> TREE_SET_BLOCK has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
15 matches
Mail list logo
