https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:547692808b419da9ed33a9259d031cf62c614dfc
commit r9-10111-g547692808b419da9ed33a9259d031cf62c614dfc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13d2dd6aee56b9e06d5fe3a6f2d9b76ee0818d54
commit r10-10655-g13d2dd6aee56b9e06d5fe3a6f2d9b76ee0818d54
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98cbc9b6ae37fd8b1b1bea1d15f0e427e8f36daa
commit r11-9335-g98cbc9b6ae37fd8b1b1bea1d15f0e427e8f36daa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a84177aff7ca86f501d6aa5ef407fac5e71f56fb
commit r12-5397-ga84177aff7ca86f501d6aa5ef407fac5e71f56fb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
cp_gimplify_expr uses for CALL_EXPR_REVERSE_ARGS and CALL_EXPR_ORDERED_ARGS
(and for !CALL_EXPR_OPERATOR_SYNTAX method calls) gimplify_arg, but that
clearly isn't enough once there are any TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
Matthijs van Duin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijsvanduin at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
--- Comment #2 from TC ---
It occurred to me that one issue here is whether initialization of the
parameter object (of the constructor) is considered a "value computation [or]
side effect associated with" an initializer-clause. If not, then the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796
Jason Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lefticus at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
12 matches
Mail list logo
