[Bug c++/70796] New: [DR 1030] Initialization order with braced-init-lists still broken

[rs2740 at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796

            Bug ID: 70796
           Summary: [DR 1030] Initialization order with braced-init-lists
                    still broken
           Product: gcc
           Version: 7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rs2740 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The following modified test case (replacing postfix ++ with prefix and
adjusting the expected values accordingly) from PR61382 still aborts on Wandbox
(http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/IQojTl16DtIxCd2M) and also gives a bogus
-Wsequence-point warning:

struct A
{
  int i,j;
  A(int i,int j):i(i),j(j){}
};

int main()
{
  int i = 0;
  A a{++i, ++i};
  if (a.i != 1 || a.j != 2)
    __builtin_abort();
}