https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71590
--- Comment #4 from gliu ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> There is a (subtle) difference between the initialization in "std::string s
> = a;" and the assignment in "std::string s; s = a;" When valid, the
> initialization invokes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71590
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
There is a (subtle) difference between the initialization in "std::string s =
a;" and the assignment in "std::string s; s = a;" When valid, the
initialization invokes a constructor (possibly two), while the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71590
--- Comment #2 from gliu ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> It is true that there is no std::string::operator=(int) but the assignment
> in 'x = a' resolves to std::string::operator(char). The program is valid.
Thanks for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71590
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
