https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We really need fine grained TREE_NO_WARNING, will see if I manage to implement
something for stage3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > Looks like warn_uninit() suppresses the warning on 'i' because the
> > TREE_NO_WARNING flag is set on the AR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Looks like warn_uninit() suppresses the warning on 'i' because the
> TREE_NO_WARNING flag is set on the ARRAY_REF by the C++ FE (in
> finish_parenthesized_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started most likely with r177667, r177670 doesn't warn, r177661 does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
