[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 10 17:35:54 2017 New Revision: 246042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246042=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79960 - alias templates and partial ordering * pt.c

[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- This is a problem with deducing through what I'm calling "non-transparent" aliases in partial ordering. When partial ordering compares, say, const and const volatile, we deduce "volatile __has_tuple_size"

[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's possible this isn't a bug, and the partial specializations need to be constrained to avoid the ambiguity (although both Clang trunk and EDG accept the unconstrained cases, but Clang 3.x fails

[Bug c++/79960] [5/6/7 Regression] Class template partial specializations for const volatile types don't match

2017-03-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5