[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-08-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raskolnikov at gnu dot org ---

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 31 17:53:06 2017 New Revision: 248753 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248753=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80605 - __is_standard_layout and empty base * class.c

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 25 21:24:36 2017 New Revision: 248470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248470=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80605 - __is_standard_layout and zero-length array *

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-15 Thread ed at catmur dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 --- Comment #8 from Ed Catmur --- Looks to have been fixed by r247816.

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-03 Thread lloda at bluewin dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 --- Comment #5 from lloda at bluewin dot ch --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to lloda from comment #0) > > gcc 7.1.0 prints False for the following program. gcc 6.3.0 and others print > > True. > > > > // $CXX

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to lloda from comment #0) > gcc 7.1.0 prints False for the following program. gcc 6.3.0 and others print > True. > > // $CXX -std=c++14 -o stdlayout stdlayout.C Are you sure about that? I can

[Bug c++/80605] [7/8 Regression] Bad is_standard_layout result with empty base classes

2017-05-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3