https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 30 17:43:08 2017
New Revision: 255279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82219 - bogus -Wignored-qualifiers with template
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgunderson at bigfoot dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well, then gcc could warn for the ignored const of the function return type as
well.
I don't think this warning makes much sense for templates.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|[8 Regress