[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-09-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfe0485ff571a7cd27d2c1115f1fea1a5fecc17c commit r8-10894-gcfe0485ff571a7cd27d2c1115f1fea1a5fecc17c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-04-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c085d6d783f38f008ea54f80b43f6b8e8f6b971 commit r9-9429-g6c085d6d783f38f008ea54f80b43f6b8e8f6b971 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-03-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:529e3b3402bd2a97b02318bd834df72815be5f0f commit r10-9480-g529e3b3402bd2a97b02318bd834df72815be5f0f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-03-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-03-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b8fa12015f717ac7e4fe2ffbad96a0cb0df2584 commit r11-7485-g0b8fa12015f717ac7e4fe2ffbad96a0cb0df2584 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2021-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aatsnps at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2017-11-14 Thread mukesh.kapoor at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Mukesh Kapoor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mukesh.kapoor at oracle dot com ---

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

2017-11-13 Thread ixsci at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 --- Comment #1 from Evgeniy Shcherbina --- Not that it matters much, but it should be "int i = -1;" in the code to match my description fully.