[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2 commit r12-70-g3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 84690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC