https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.kosoru at pobox dot sk
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #17 from Patrick Palka ---
This won't be implemented in time for GCC 12, sadly.
FWIW a class-scope explicit specialization should in most cases be equivalent
to an appropriately constrained partial specialization. So as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dl.soluz at gmx dot net
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yawaraka.7-11.hemogurobin@e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qwdkguneykiffmmuyd at uivvn
dot ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan at danny dot cz
--- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-09-08 00:00:00 |2020-8-6
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to S. Davis Herring from comment #9)
> > But it's not a DR, so it only applies to C++17 and not C++14 or older
> > standards.
>
> Isn't it? Its motion does say "accept as Defect Reports".
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
S. Davis Herring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herring at lanl dot gov
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Compare to e.g.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1825 which says
"[Moved to DR at the November, 2016 meeting.]" That means it's a retroactive
fix for previous standards. That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Rustam Abdullaev from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> > https://wg21.link/cwg727
> >
> > N.B. this is a C++17 feature that does not seem to have been approved as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #5 from Rustam Abdullaev ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> https://wg21.link/cwg727
>
> N.B. this is a C++17 feature that does not seem to have been approved as a
> DR, but Clang supports it in all language modes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikelojkovic at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://wg21.link/cwg727
N.B. this is a C++17 feature that does not seem to have been approved as a DR,
but Clang supports it in all language modes.
Carlo, as an aside, your allocator fails to meet the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Carlo Wood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
--- Comment #1 from songyuanyao ---
The error message for the code (from gcc8.0.1):
error: explicit specialization in non-namespace scope
21 matches
Mail list logo
