[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2021-12-16 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 CC|

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2021-08-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Dup of PR 51577 ? Well it does seem fixed on the trunk and that PR is fixed on the trunk (though not closed).

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2020-06-23 Thread language.lawyer at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Language Lawyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||language.lawyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2018-09-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2018-09-04 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #2 from SztfG at yandex dot ru --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Dup of PR 51577 ? Strictly speaking, it is not a dup, because PR 51577 and all the bugs marked as dups of PR 51577 are about finding an operator with

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2018-09-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Dup of PR 51577 ?