https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 8 10:06:33 2019
New Revision: 267695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267695=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-12-04 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 4 08:44:12 2018
New Revision: 266772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266772=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/88103
* typeck.c (build_class_member_access_expr): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45126
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45126=edit
gcc9-pr88103.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Possibly unrelated, but PR 67795 is another example where ?: has the wrong
value category depending on where it is used (cast vs return).
>From my comment in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
