https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e50627ff8cd54c3983614b34727323b333b9374d
commit r9-8351-ge50627ff8cd54c3983614b34727323b333b9374d
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #12 from asutton at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: asutton
Date: Wed Nov 27 15:09:22 2019
New Revision: 278773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278773=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-27 Andrew Sutton
PR c++/88395
Prevent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #11 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #10)
> I don't think this is a valid testcase: operator+= requires Concept, but
> checking Concept depends on operator+=. It would be good for the compiler
> to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #8 from Nicholas Krause ---
Created attachment 46334
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46334=edit
Proposed Proper Bug Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #9 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #8)
> Created attachment 46334 [details]
> Proposed Proper Bug Fix
This is the proper bug fix after tracing it seems and looking at other callers
in that file. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #7 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #6)
> Created attachment 45242 [details]
> Proposed Bug Fix
This is my proposed fix after tracing it and reading it carefully seems that
passing the NULL_TREE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #6 from Nicholas Krause ---
Created attachment 45242
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45242=edit
Proposed Bug Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Emmanuel Le Trong from comment #0)
> Both trunk and 8.2.1 segfault on this valid snippet
And 7.4.1 too. The flag -std=c++2a isn't relevant, only -fconcepts is needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #3 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Emmanuel Le Trong from comment #2)
> (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1)
> > First off that's just a valid snippet without a class definition so I was
> > unable to build it against
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Le Trong ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1)
> First off that's just a valid snippet without a class definition so I was
> unable to build it against gcc itself to even check this is a bug. Further
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
nik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
15 matches
Mail list logo
