https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> That fold_build_pointer_plus_loc looks premat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That fold_build_pointer_plus_loc looks premature to me in any case given the
desire to delay folding. We have tons of those through the C as well as C++
FEs though.
E.g. pointer_int_sum calls:
fold_build2_lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
If you ask the middle-end about such expressions you get its view. So if you
want to apply language semantics you need to avoid folding it with those
routines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
