https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Hannes Hauswedell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #14)
> The problem is that here
> 24072 /* Instantiate a dynamic exception-specification. noexcept will
> be
> 24073 handled below. */
> 24074
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek ---
The problem is that here
24072 /* Instantiate a dynamic exception-specification. noexcept will be
24073 handled below. */
24074 if (tree raises = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
Adjusted testcase that is compiled with GCC 8.3 without errors:
namespace a {
template struct d { static constexpr int f = c; };
template struct g;
template h i(int);
template auto ab() ->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 90003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection,|ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46092|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #7 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 46177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46177=edit
preprocessed source file from gcc8 (no ICE)
This is the compressed but unreduced preprocessed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #6 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Here is the code snippet that triggers the ICE:
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
std::vector v{0, 1, 2, 3, 4};
for (auto e : v | ranges::view::reverse)
{
std::cout <<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please attach also original (unreduced pre-processed test-case),
ideally created with GCC8?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #4 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Hi gcc-team,
is there any news about this issue? This ICE currently is always triggered when
using the range-v3 library using the 1.0-beta branch with concepts.
Let me know, if you need more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #3 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Hi sorry,
it took me a while to provide the preprocessed source file. I have reduced it
with multidelta.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #2 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 46092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46092=edit
reduced preprocessed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
18 matches
Mail list logo
