[Bug c++/90320] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly

2019-11-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.5 |8.4 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/90320] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly

2019-10-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/90320] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly

2019-10-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5

[Bug c++/90320] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly

2019-05-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Adam Mitz from comment #0) > May be related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87605 but > this doesn't involve the ternary operator. It's similar, but I don't think it's the same

[Bug c++/90320] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly

2019-05-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|