[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paolo Carlini : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83fe2b921830c177e3dee514aa07cbc7c8ceef1c commit r10-5990-g83fe2b921830c177e3dee514aa07cbc7c8ceef1c Author: Paolo Carlini Date: W

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini --- I have been making progress on this (I'm in contact with Jason about that) but unfortunately the issue requires additional analysis for the simple reason that if I remove/amend my r260482 changes then in C++

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Dec 3 23:57:46 2019 New Revision: 278951 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278951&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++: Implement spaceship for std::pair (P1614R2) This defines oper

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-11-19 00:00:00 |2019-12-3 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-07-03 00:00:00 |2019-11-19 --- Comment #6 from Jonatha

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- You are right.

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- In principle the issue is rather simple. The cp_parser_maybe_commit_to_declaration at the beginning of cp_parser_condition since r260482 thinks erroneously that the just parsed HasInit must be a declaration.

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.2

[Bug c++/91073] [9/10 Regression] if constexpr no longer works directly with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91073 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|